Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brȧnemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: A preliminary report

Identifieur interne : 00AA71 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 00AA70; suivant : 00AA72

A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brȧnemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: A preliminary report

Auteurs : I. Naert [Belgique] ; M. Quirynen [Belgique] ; M. Hooghe [Belgique] ; D. Van Steenberghe [Belgique]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:6F83CC2B8806E56A2E00C09E9AB3A5D60F4A7829

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Abstract: Thirty-six edentulous patients, each provided with two Brȧnemark implants in the mandible to anchor an overdenture, were selected for this study and randomly divided into three groups of 12 patients each. In each group a different attachment system was used: (1) magnets, (2) ball attachments, and (3) straight bars with clips (control). The mean loading time was 12.4 months (range 3 to 24 months). This study investigated (1) the clinical behavior of loaded implants by means of overdentures related to their connection system (splinted versus unsplinted) and (2) the clinical performance of prosthetic treatment. Preliminary results indicate no differences; no failures occurred and the level of marginal bone height, as well as the probing attachment level, changed similarly in the three groups. Although splinted bar-retained overdentures scored better objectively, subjective satisfaction ratings did not differ. It was concluded that for the short follow-up period, the state of connection did not influence the clinical success of implants. However, no definite conclusions may be drawn until long-term data become available.

Url:
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90188-0


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brȧnemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: A preliminary report</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Naert, I" sort="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I." last="Naert">I. Naert</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M." last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hooghe, M" sort="Hooghe, M" uniqKey="Hooghe M" first="M." last="Hooghe">M. Hooghe</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D." last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:6F83CC2B8806E56A2E00C09E9AB3A5D60F4A7829</idno>
<date when="1994" year="1994">1994</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/0022-3913(94)90188-0</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/6F83CC2B8806E56A2E00C09E9AB3A5D60F4A7829/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003719</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">003719</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">003719</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">004F33</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">004F33</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0022-3913:1994:Naert I:a:comparative:prospective</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">00B113</idno>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:8006845</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">004449</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">004449</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">004449</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">004449</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">004449</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">004449</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">009376</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">009376</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">009376</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0022-3913:1994:Naert I:a:comparative:prospective</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">00B057</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">00AA71</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">00AA71</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a">A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brȧnemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: A preliminary report</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Naert, I" sort="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I." last="Naert">I. Naert</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Belgique</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Leuven</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M." last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Belgique</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Leuven</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hooghe, M" sort="Hooghe, M" uniqKey="Hooghe M" first="M." last="Hooghe">M. Hooghe</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Belgique</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Leuven</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D." last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Belgique</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Leuven</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">YMPR</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<date type="published" when="1994">1994</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">71</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="486">486</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="492">492</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Abutment</term>
<term>Abutment connection</term>
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Aged, 80 and over</term>
<term>Angle class</term>
<term>Attachment</term>
<term>Attachment components</term>
<term>Attachment system</term>
<term>Attachment systems</term>
<term>Ball attachments</term>
<term>Baseline</term>
<term>Bone loss</term>
<term>Branemark</term>
<term>Branemark implants</term>
<term>Branemark system</term>
<term>Clinical dentistry</term>
<term>Connection system</term>
<term>Definite conclusions</term>
<term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term>
<term>Dental Implants</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture Retention (methods)</term>
<term>Denture, Complete</term>
<term>Denture, Overlay</term>
<term>Different attachment systems</term>
<term>Different periods</term>
<term>Dyna magnets</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Entire period</term>
<term>Failure rate</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>First year</term>
<term>Fixture</term>
<term>Food remnants</term>
<term>Frequency distribution</term>
<term>Functional benefits</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term>
<term>Loading time</term>
<term>Magnet</term>
<term>Main reason</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Mandible (surgery)</term>
<term>Marginal bone height</term>
<term>Marginal bone level</term>
<term>Marginal bone loss</term>
<term>Marginal tissue reactions</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Naert</term>
<term>Observation periods</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac surg</term>
<term>Osseointegrated</term>
<term>Osseointegrated fixtures</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Osseointegrated titanium fixtures</term>
<term>Osseointegration (physiology)</term>
<term>Overdentures</term>
<term>Patient Satisfaction</term>
<term>Periodontal Index</term>
<term>Periodontal parameters</term>
<term>Periodontal probe</term>
<term>Periotest value</term>
<term>Preliminary results</term>
<term>Prospective Studies</term>
<term>Prospective study</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthetic dentistry</term>
<term>Prosthetic parameters</term>
<term>Quintessence publishing</term>
<term>Quirynen</term>
<term>Retrospective study</term>
<term>Single fixtures</term>
<term>Sixth edition</term>
<term>Steenberghe</term>
<term>Unconnected implants</term>
<term>Year report</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Implants dentaires</term>
<term>Indice parodontal</term>
<term>Mandibule ()</term>
<term>Mâchoire édentée ()</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Ostéo-intégration (physiologie)</term>
<term>Overdenture</term>
<term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire complète</term>
<term>Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire ()</term>
<term>Satisfaction du patient</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
<term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus</term>
<term>Études prospectives</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en">
<term>Dental Implants</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en">
<term>Denture Retention</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiologie" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Ostéo-intégration</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Osseointegration</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en">
<term>Jaw, Edentulous</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Abutment</term>
<term>Abutment connection</term>
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Aged, 80 and over</term>
<term>Angle class</term>
<term>Attachment</term>
<term>Attachment components</term>
<term>Attachment system</term>
<term>Attachment systems</term>
<term>Ball attachments</term>
<term>Baseline</term>
<term>Bone loss</term>
<term>Branemark</term>
<term>Branemark implants</term>
<term>Branemark system</term>
<term>Clinical dentistry</term>
<term>Connection system</term>
<term>Definite conclusions</term>
<term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Denture, Complete</term>
<term>Denture, Overlay</term>
<term>Different attachment systems</term>
<term>Different periods</term>
<term>Dyna magnets</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Entire period</term>
<term>Failure rate</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>First year</term>
<term>Fixture</term>
<term>Food remnants</term>
<term>Frequency distribution</term>
<term>Functional benefits</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Loading time</term>
<term>Magnet</term>
<term>Main reason</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Marginal bone height</term>
<term>Marginal bone level</term>
<term>Marginal bone loss</term>
<term>Marginal tissue reactions</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Naert</term>
<term>Observation periods</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac surg</term>
<term>Osseointegrated</term>
<term>Osseointegrated fixtures</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Osseointegrated titanium fixtures</term>
<term>Overdentures</term>
<term>Patient Satisfaction</term>
<term>Periodontal Index</term>
<term>Periodontal parameters</term>
<term>Periodontal probe</term>
<term>Periotest value</term>
<term>Preliminary results</term>
<term>Prospective Studies</term>
<term>Prospective study</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthetic dentistry</term>
<term>Prosthetic parameters</term>
<term>Quintessence publishing</term>
<term>Quirynen</term>
<term>Retrospective study</term>
<term>Single fixtures</term>
<term>Sixth edition</term>
<term>Steenberghe</term>
<term>Unconnected implants</term>
<term>Year report</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Implants dentaires</term>
<term>Indice parodontal</term>
<term>Mandibule</term>
<term>Mâchoire édentée</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Overdenture</term>
<term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire complète</term>
<term>Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire</term>
<term>Satisfaction du patient</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
<term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus</term>
<term>Études prospectives</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: Thirty-six edentulous patients, each provided with two Brȧnemark implants in the mandible to anchor an overdenture, were selected for this study and randomly divided into three groups of 12 patients each. In each group a different attachment system was used: (1) magnets, (2) ball attachments, and (3) straight bars with clips (control). The mean loading time was 12.4 months (range 3 to 24 months). This study investigated (1) the clinical behavior of loaded implants by means of overdentures related to their connection system (splinted versus unsplinted) and (2) the clinical performance of prosthetic treatment. Preliminary results indicate no differences; no failures occurred and the level of marginal bone height, as well as the probing attachment level, changed similarly in the three groups. Although splinted bar-retained overdentures scored better objectively, subjective satisfaction ratings did not differ. It was concluded that for the short follow-up period, the state of connection did not influence the clinical success of implants. However, no definite conclusions may be drawn until long-term data become available.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Belgique</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="Belgique">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Naert, I" sort="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I." last="Naert">I. Naert</name>
</noRegion>
<name sortKey="Hooghe, M" sort="Hooghe, M" uniqKey="Hooghe M" first="M." last="Hooghe">M. Hooghe</name>
<name sortKey="Quirynen, M" sort="Quirynen, M" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="M." last="Quirynen">M. Quirynen</name>
<name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D." last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 00AA71 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 00AA71 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:6F83CC2B8806E56A2E00C09E9AB3A5D60F4A7829
   |texte=   A comparative prospective study of splinted and unsplinted Brȧnemark implants in mandibular overdenture therapy: A preliminary report
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022